I tried to move USDT from Binance. Three names sit in this case. They are not one party.
PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_ is the seller profile on Binance. OASIS NAIL SALON & SPA CORP is the name on the Zelle account. Angel Mauricio Illescas Ordoñez is the person I say is behind that Zelle account, and the person I say filed the dispute. That is what I say was confirmed on the call with Paul from bank security. I am not saying that call confirmed a scam. I am not saying he is PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_.
The advertiser page I have is this page. I am not saying the profile name is visible on that page.
I do reverse engineering on almost everything. I am doing it now to crypto, and to what sits behind it. I start from the transaction. The business name on that line is OASIS NAIL SALON & SPA CORP. I look that name up online. I look for the people behind it. I check that the organization is real. Then I trace back to the seller on the exchange, PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_. I have already done this with the business that showed up on the transaction. I am going to do the same with the name on the exchange side. This is my method. It is not a finding that those names are one party, and it is not a finding that I have proved the link.
The public record is the New York Department of State entity inquiry. What I am taking from that registry is that the entity exists, that it is active, that it is a domestic business corporation, that the initial filing is 21 June 2022, that it is in Queens, and that the statement status is past due. I am not adding another name. I am not printing an address.
On 1 October, Chase shows a Zelle credit of two thousand dollars. The line reads as a Zelle payment from OASIS NAIL SALON & SPA CORP. The capture is 2_Areas/Persona/finance/Binance-Zelle-reverso-2000-2026-10-04/04-chase-zelle-credit-oasis-2000-2026-10-01.png. I am not printing the reference on that line.
A dispute opened. The money went back. The letter only said the credit was not owed. I am not saying Chase confirmed a scam, or how their system decided. I say I was clearly scammed on my side. I say I am the victim. That is my claim. The bank has not verified it. The exchange has not verified it.
The captures I am pointing at on the Binance side show Feedback (9999+), 99.86%, and Negative (18). Those figures are on PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_. I am not putting them on the salon. I am not quoting the reviews. I am not saying those other notes prove what happened to me.
I have seen the same shape in restaurants. A long list of good reviews. A short list of bad ones that describe one trick. The long list gets used as proof that the short list cannot be true. I am not saying I have shown that trick on this profile, and I am not saying it about the salon.
In my own transfer, Binance's check rejected the video I sent, and the money went back on Chase without asking me. A stack of praise is not proof that the matching complaints are noise. An automated reversal is not a finding that the receiver did wrong. A detector that refuses the file the company told you to send is not a closed case. It is a loop.
This is the first note. The case is not over.
John Garcia Duran