I have watched restaurants use a long list of praise as proof that the complaints cannot be real. I have also seen reviews go up and later come down. That is what I have watched there. I am not saying PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_ published fake reviews and then deleted them. I am not saying that about OASIS NAIL SALON & SPA CORP. I have not shown that. Zelle is the rail on the transfer, not the review page.
The three names stay split. PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_ is the Binance profile. OASIS NAIL SALON & SPA CORP is the Zelle account name. Angel Mauricio Illescas Ordoñez is the person I say is behind that Zelle, and the person I say filed the dispute, from the call with Paul from bank security. He is not the Binance profile. I am not saying that call confirmed a scam.
I do reverse engineering on almost everything, and I am applying it here to crypto and to what sits behind it. The path I am walking is the transaction, then the business name on it, then an online lookup, then the people behind that name, then a check that the organization is real, then back to the Binance seller. I have already done that with OASIS NAIL SALON & SPA CORP, the business on the transaction. I am going to do the same with PRESTIGE-CRYPTO_, the name on the exchange side. That is my method. It is not a proved link between the names.
The captures show Feedback (9999+), 99.86%, and Negative (18). Those figures are on the Binance profile. I am not putting them on the salon. I am not quoting the reviews, and I am not saying the other notes prove what happened to me.
Two captures are the ones I am pointing at. 2_Areas/Persona/finance/Binance-Zelle-reverso-2000-2026-10-04/01-feedback-jullyp2p-zelle-eliminado.png is a note under Negative, tagged Zelle, from a person writing that their Zelle was deleted after the operation. 2_Areas/Persona/finance/Binance-Zelle-reverso-2000-2026-10-04/03-feedback-p2p-72d14a9u-devolucion.png is a note under Negative, tagged Zelle, from a person writing that the user asked the bank to return the money and then reported the account. I am describing what is on the captures. I am not treating either note as verified, and I am not saying they are my transfer.
On Instagram I asked the spa whether they also work with Angel Mauricio Illescas Ordoñez. That question is open. It is not a confirmation, and it is not a result I am publishing as fact.
On my side, a check at Binance rejected the video. On Chase the two thousand dollars went back on 1 October without asking me. I say I was clearly scammed, and I say I am the victim. That is my claim. The bank has not verified it. The exchange has not verified it. The letter only says the credit was not owed. It is not a finding that I did wrong.
I am not ready to write that honest users are punished as a rule. I am writing that, in this case, the defaults did not protect the person trying to finish a real transfer. I will only close that question when the case ends.
John Garcia Duran